The News Site of Santa Monica College

The Corsair

Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?

The+entrance+of+Santa+Monica+Airport+is+shown+on+Tuesday.+The+debate+among+Santa+Monica+community+members+over+the+existence+of+the+airport+has+reignited+since+the+Sept.+29+plane+crash.Photo+credit%3A+Simon+Luca+Manili.
The entrance of Santa Monica Airport is shown on Tuesday. The debate among Santa Monica community members over the existence of the airport has reignited since the Sept. 29 plane crash.Photo credit: Simon Luca Manili.

The entrance of Santa Monica Airport is shown on Tuesday. The debate among Santa Monica community members over the existence of the airport has reignited since the Sept. 29 plane crash.Photo credit: Simon Luca Manili.

The entrance of Santa Monica Airport is shown on Tuesday. The debate among Santa Monica community members over the existence of the airport has reignited since the Sept. 29 plane crash.Photo credit: Simon Luca Manili.

Advertisement

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Santa Monica College media professor Jacquelyn Horwitz was on her way to teach a class at the Bundy campus when a private jet from the Santa Monica Municipal Airport flew a little too close for comfort.

“That thing was right above my head,” said Horwitz, while sharing her feelings of what she called a “highly dangerous” location for an airport. “Had there been a malfunction, I’d be dead.”

Debates about whether SMO should remain intact as a functioning airport have once again risen due to the Sept. 29 crash of a jet at the airport, which left four dead.

According to the Community Against Santa Monica Airport Traffic website, in 1984, the city of Santa Monica and the Federal Aviation Administration settled an agreement that gave airport control over to the city. That contract is set to expire in 2015.

Stemios Mharides, a
cting airport manager of SMO, said that the airport staff and management have no input on the fate of the airport, as it is the city council and the FAA that direct those decisions.

“Our sole responsibility is to take care of the operations of the airport,” said Mharides.

As far as the investigation of safety procedures and defects within the airport is concerned, Mharides said that it is the National Transportation Safety Board, and not the airport management that handles the investigation’s progress.

Residents against keeping the airport in place after 2015 have been weighing alternative options of a possible airport removal, and what that would mean for the city of Santa Monica.

The most speculated renovation would be to turn the airport into the largest park in Santa Monica, supported by the coalition group Airport2Park. According to the organization’s website, the park would allow a wide range of new activities such as walking, hiking, jogging, and cycling.

The plan even includes building a playground within the park. The intent of these organizations is pure, and I do agree with the sentiment for change.

The thought that an airport can remain operating in such close proximity to a residential area without any backlash or consequence is a fantasy within the mind of delusional individuals.

With SMC’s Bundy and Airport campuses being in such close proximity to the airport, the current location of the airport puts the lives of thousands of students at risk every single day.

“It’s just scary,”
said Horwitz. “There are too many residents. There are too many students coming and going.”

An extremist would say that taking risks is a necessity for the advancement of an ever-growing world. But when the lives of thousands of students and residents alike are being jeopardized each time a jet flies onto the runway, the risk is hardly worth the reward.

The victor of this battle lies within whichever side tugs harder. There are environmentalists who believe the airport should be turned into an oasis for those looking to spend afternoons out with their white picket fence family, strolling down the park while smelling the fresh grassy product of mother nature.

Other, much more money-centered individuals, focus on the amount of zeros the airport provides to the city and the number of jobs it supports.

According to HR&A; Advisors, Inc., SMO contributes around $275 million to the city’s economy, and it supports nearly 1,475 jobs.

That is indeed a hefty sum of money being deposited into the bank of Santa Monica’s many luxuries such as its businesses and schools. It must be hard to care about innocent lives at stake while the airport is stacking up money in the bank.

Still, one must maintain a sense of morality and realize that keeping the airport there is simply a bad idea. People who are pro-airport are likely to ramble about how it was simply one accident and how there is a low chance of it happening again.

According to a study by the Santa Monica Patch, there have been at least five accidents within the last decade that involved a plane missing the runway.

For every one of these planes that narrowly misses its mark by a few feet, a resident of Santa Monica is at risk of being treated to a special 3-D version of “Final Destination.”

The airport needs to go, but a park is not a logical idea either. The fact that SMO is a revenue machine for the city of Santa Monica should derail any hopes of park implications. A park would not be able to match the revenue that the airport currently generates, nor the jobs it employs.

A recreation center and even the long-shot of a National Football League stadium, have been speculated. These would make more ideal match-ups for SMO’s revenue and job employment.

Sadly, the airport is not going anywhere anytime soon. A park victory over SMO seems more like a pipe dream than a reality. With no other options being considered, SMO will remain intact, while the lives of thousands of Santa Monica residents stay at risk every day.

Facebook
Twitter
Visit Us
YOUTUBE
Instagram

1 Comment

One Response to “Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?”

  1. John Jerabek on November 24th, 2013 3:03 pm

    Hi Jonathan,

    Thanks for your article, the more discussion about our airport the better. I have to disagree with some of your assertions, and hopefully I can encourage you to consider a different perspective. Simply put, the airport is there to provide access to our national airways. This access is analogous to a public beach giving all of us access to the sea, or a bike lane on a public street carving out a safer ride.

    The challenges that face Santa Monica with regard to noise, pollution and safety are true for every transportation system in every urban area across the nation, be it Interstate Freeway, Public Bus, Light Rail, or just our automobiles. These challenges should be faced head on, and Santa Monica should be congratulating itself for having the most stringent noise ordinances in the nation, highest awareness about these issues and continue to lead the way for safer, cleaner, quieter urban aviation. The opponents to the airport purport concern about these issues, but the only solution they ever offer is closure. That’s not very interesting to me, and its certainly not the way problems are solved for this or the next generation.

    When our cars and buses spewed black diesel fumes and emissions from leaded gasoline, we recognized the problems addressed them with innovation, cleaner fuels and now we even have companies like Tesla Motors, producing the best electric cars the world has ever known. Clean, safe, quiet aviation for all of us, is not only possible, its possible much sooner than we think and the young people like yourself at SMC should be creating that vision and defining the next era of aviation, just like Donald Douglas did, right here in Santa Monica. If I were you I’d be asking “Hey, if we close the airport, where am I going to land my flying car?”

    Best,

    John

    PS typo: It’s “Stelios Makrides” not “Stemios Mharides”

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?

    Opinion

    World Politics: Today’s Most Frustrating Topic

  • Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?

    Opinion

    Measure H: The Better Alternative To Doing Nothing

  • Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?

    Opinion

    Capitalism is Cancelled

  • Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?

    Opinion

    Planned Parenthood: Why I’m Not Ashamed

  • Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?

    Opinion

    How Feminism Made Me a Better Man

  • Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?

    Opinion

    Where are You, Obama?

  • Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?

    Opinion

    The Life of Zelda

  • Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?

    Opinion

    Fifty Shades of Trump: Valentine’s Day in the age of The Donald

  • Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?

    Opinion

    Why The Media Constantly Targets the Middle East and Gulf States

  • Santa Monica Airport in its final destination?

    Opinion

    Trump Promises